About
A Letter from the Founder
I built ADRoit3 because I watched good people lose too much — too much time, too much money, and too many relationships — over disagreements that should have been settled in an afternoon.
Here is what I observed, over and over again: two parties who already know they need to reach a number. A buyer and a seller. A landlord and a tenant. A contractor and a client. Both understand that a settlement amount exists somewhere between their two positions. Both would prefer to find that number and move on with their lives. And yet the systems available to them — litigation, arbitration, mediation, even informal negotiation — are designed as though every dispute requires months of procedure, thousands of dollars in professional fees, and an adversarial framework that turns a disagreement into a battle.
For many disputes, that framework is not just unnecessary. It is destructive. The legal fees alone can exceed the amount in dispute. The timeline stretches from weeks into months and sometimes years. And the emotional toll — the stress, the damaged relationships, the lingering resentment — often costs more than the money ever did.
I kept returning to a simple question: when two parties each have a number, and both are willing to consider the others position, why can there not be a structured, objective, fast path to a fair answer?
That question became ADRoit3.
The 3 in our name represents our three-step process. Each party enters their numerical claim. Both then click through eighteen evaluations of numbers between their two positions within a forty-five-minute countdown. Both view the algorithm-driven monetary analysis recommendation, with ten minutes to accept or reject. The entire process completes in under one hour.
There is no lawyer required. There is no registration. There is no scheduling coordinator, no conference room, no flight to a neutral city. There is a keyboard, an internet connection, and an algorithm that does not advocate for either side.
I want to be direct about what ADRoit3 is and what it is not. It is not a replacement for the court system. Complex legal matters involving questions of law, liability determinations, or constitutional rights belong in courtrooms with qualified attorneys. ADRoit3 serves a different category entirely: the vast universe of numerical disagreements where both parties already acknowledge that a settlement figure exists — they simply cannot close the gap between their positions without help.
That category is enormous. And it is global.
Which brings me to the principle that matters most to me personally: accessibility. Dispute resolution should not be a luxury reserved for those who can afford attorneys and filing fees. A shopkeeper in Lagos deserves the same access to a fair process as a corporation in London. A farmer in rural India and a freelance designer in Buenos Aires and a small business owner in Fort Pierce, Florida — all of them encounter numerical disputes, and none of them should be priced out of resolution.
That is why ADRoit3 operates on a Pay What You Can Afford model, with a minimum of fifty cents per user. Not fifty dollars. Not five hundred dollars. Fifty cents. Because the price of resolving a disagreement should never exceed what a person can reasonably afford to pay.
We have been refining this technology since 2010. The algorithm behind ADRoit3 is not a simple average or a coin flip dressed in software. It is the product of years of development, testing, and iteration — protected by U.S. patents because it represents something genuinely new in the field of dispute resolution.
I am not interested in hype. I am not going to tell you we are disrupting an industry or revolutionizing justice. What I will tell you is this: ADRoit3 works. It is fast, it is affordable, it is private, and it is available right now to anyone with a keyboard and an internet connection, anywhere in the world.
If you are curious, try the demo on our site. It walks you through a hypothetical paint dispute using our demonstration currency. It takes a few minutes. No registration, no commitment. Just see for yourself how the process works, and then decide whether it might serve you or someone you know.
Thank you for your time.
Sincerely,
Robert Reilly
Founder, Adroit 3 Corp.
Fort Pierce, Florida
Our Home page graphic portrays our aim to save you Time and Money
Pricing
In consideration of the range of incomes worldwide, the fee per case is Pay What You Can Afford.
Pricing is in United States Dollars. Our minimum payment is only $0.50 USD (50 cents) per user.
Parties
The opposing parties are identified as the Convey Party and the Receive Party.
The Convey Party expresses a contingent willingness to convey monetary compensation to the Receive Party.
The Receive Party expresses a contingent willingness to receive monetary compensation from the Convey Party.
To utilize the ADRoit-3 process, one Convey Party and one Receive Party are mandatory.
Start – Verification – Countdowns
Utilizing a Step by Step format, the Start page intuitively guides the above Parties through the ADRoit-3 process.
Full Verification of initial Claims takes place near the beginning of the process.
Countdowns enable the resolution process to advance in an expeditious manner.
- Countdown A begins when the 18 Considerations commence.
- Countdown A provides a maximum 45 minute time allotment for the completion of the 18 Considerations.
- Both parties completing Countdown A in less than 45 minutes will enable immediate advancement to the Countdown B portion of the process.
- Countdown B provides 10 minutes for the parties to Accept or Reject the Monetary Analysis.
